The Plotkin Thickens: Vaccine Toxins and Informed Consentt
The Plotkin Tapes are viewable on YouTube. They contain nine hours of Court Deposition as filmed on 11th January 2018, featuring New York Attorney Mr Aaron Siri, and Dr Stanley Plotkin. Dr Plotkin is referred to, by many industry insiders, as the Godfather of vaccines. They give context to the development of vaccines – but are not for the squeamish. They help frame current toxic contaminants in vaccines and how we have a dark history of respect for ‘informed consent’. Perhaps, Godfather is a correct term, for some.
Are We Complying With Informed Consent Laws?
Medical Ethics and the Respect of Patient Autonomy: Medical ethics, as a term, dates from 1803. These values include the respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Such tenets may allow doctors, care providers, and families to create a treatment plan and work towards the same common goal without any conflict. It is important to note that these four values are non-hierarchical, meaning no one principle routinely “trumps” another.
Department of Health Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment: Page 13, Paragraph 18: It is therefore advisable to inform the person of any ‘material’ or ‘significant’ risks or unavoidable risks, even if small, in the proposed treatment; any alternatives to it; and the risks incurred by doing nothing. A Court of Appeal judgment stated that it will normally be the responsibility of the doctor to inform a patient of ‘a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient’.19 FollowingChester v Afshar, it is advisable that healthcare professionals give information about all significant possible adverse outcomes and make a record of information given.
Montgomery Ruling: As published in the BMJ, 12thMay 2017: the ethical and legal position is clear: doctors must not withhold information simply because they disagree with the decision the patient is likely to make if given that information.
All should ask to see the PIL (Patient Information Leaflet) before being vaccinated – if they wish to do so, after studying the contents of harms and stated ingredients.
Why Do Vaccines Contain Known Human Toxins?
For many decades vaccines have contained known human toxins. Yet, most people are unaware that vaccines contain: cell lines derived from aborted human tissue, calf serum, monkey kidney products, bovine cells, yeast, casein, pesticides, and formaldehyde. The measles virus, for the MMR vaccine is grown in chick embryos, enabling the spread of retroviruses. HPV vaccines contain polysorbate 80 (a patented infertility compound also called Tween 80) and Borax, known to kill cockroaches. Amongst metals: Aluminium hydroxide, a vaccine adjuvant (used to boost immune response to an antigen) is a known neurotoxin, and impairs human functions. Thimerosal (or ethyl mercury) is used as a preservative but is very highly toxic and is still used in vaccines – despite a US Government ruling to eliminate it, in 2004.
Hippocratic Oath – Forbids the Administering of Poisons:“Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course”.
It’s all ‘anecdotal’, and a ‘coincidence’ after all:Vioxx, the arthritis wonder drug underwent clinical approval and was proven to be ‘safe and effective’. Taken by 80 million people it was withdrawn from the market after 100,000 deaths. Of the $5 billion fine, $321 million was for criminal activities.
Where the US goes, other Countries follow.
Due to record levels of vaccine injuries, in 1985 the US Government made vaccine manufacturers exempt from legal penalty. Their business became an over-night, high margin, risk free bet. Each vaccine carries a levy for harms compensation. Since its’ formation in 1986, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out nearly $4 billion. It is administered by US government officials via the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – the same organization responsible for approving the vaccines for public marketing. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is a division of HHS. For the average citizen, the Vaccine Court offers no right of discovery, nor trial by jury.
So often, it is not the vaccine antigen (the ‘virus’) that is the issue, but the adjuvant. However, there has never been a ‘safeadjuvant’ study: aluminium was chosen as it was ‘early in the alphabet’. Since the formation of the Vaccine Court, the US has fallen 30 places in Global childhood mortality, while the official ‘vaccine schedule’ has increased 400%: ever more, ever sooner, and ever closer together.
No investigation has been undertaken into the cumulativeeffects of the increasing vaccine schedule.
In the 1930’s cotton seed allergy was rife, caused by use of cotton seed adjuvants in vaccines. The current method of vaccine production is driving the food allergy epidemic, as seen since the 1990’s.
The vaccine industry has not been willing to independentlycompare the fully Vaccinated versus the UnVaccinated, to ask the question – who IS actually healthier?
Vaccine Nurse, Gardasil ‘I Gave The Shot’:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH_d9qcZeIg
Sacrificial Virgins (part 1 of 3):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAzcMHaBvLs
Injecting Aluminium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfS38ErqVxY
348 US deaths following HPV vaccines:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHf17TSgYww
The Age of Aluminium, by Bert Ehgartner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F0u54gs0iU
The only valid UnVaccinated versus Vaccinated study was undertaken by Dr Anthony Mawson, let’s debate these findings:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbFfDQYdjzM
Dr Chris Exley, see Paper: Aluminium in Brain Tissue in Autism Spectrum Disorder: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763
Dr Yehuda Shoenfeld, World leading autoimmune expert. Autoimmune diseases triggered by vaccine adjuvants: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256113/
It’s too much, isn’t it?